From
the Grocerant Guru’s vantage point,
PepsiCo’s December announcement is less
about activist pressure and more about an overdue market correction. Reducing
prices, eliminating roughly 20 percent of SKUs by early 2026, and refocusing on
core brands signals a recognition of a fundamental truth shaping food retail
today: paying for shelf space does not build loyalty—delivering relevance,
value, and choice clarity does.
For
decades, large CPGs competed by flooding shelves. More facings, more line
extensions, more marginal SKUs, and more trade spend bought visibility but
diluted velocity. The result is what behavioral economists call the paradox
of choice—too many options create confusion, slow decision-making, reduce
satisfaction, and ultimately suppress sales. Consumers do not want infinite
beverage choices; they want the right beverage, at the right
price, in the right moment.
PepsiCo’s
acknowledgment that years of double-digit price increases weakened demand is
critical. Value perception matters more today than brand ubiquity. Shoppers are
not rejecting brands; they are rejecting friction—friction at the shelf,
friction at the register, and friction in deciding what to buy. Cutting SKUs is
not retrenchment; it is strategic focus.
The
company’s stated moves—sharper everyday value pricing, innovation around
cleaner labels and functional benefits, and aggressive cost reduction—align
with what the Grocerant Guru® has long advocated: sell beverages and snacks
consumers want, priced competitively, without forcing retailers to subsidize
inefficiency through shelf fees and excess assortment.
Importantly,
PepsiCo’s shift away from artificial ingredients, toward protein-forward and
functionally relevant offerings, is not about chasing trends—it is about
restoring trust and usage frequency. Fewer, better products outperform bloated
portfolios every time when execution is disciplined.
However,
the real opportunity is not simply SKU reduction. The real unlock is how
products are merchandised and bundled.
Grocerant Guru® Insight: Mix-and-Match Is the Growth Engine
Within
the Grocerant niche, growth does not come from buying more shelf space; it
comes from building solutions. Consumers think in occasions, not
categories. A beverage is not a standalone decision—it is part of a meal, a
snack, a routine, or a reward.
Mix-and-match
product building—pairing beverages with fresh food, protein-forward snacks, or
permissible indulgences—simplifies choice while increasing basket size. It
transforms the shopping experience from selection to solution. This approach
creates happier consumers because it reduces cognitive load and delivers value.
It creates happier stakeholders because it increases velocity, margin, and
loyalty without incremental trade spend.
The
future is not more SKUs.
The future is curated choice, competitive pricing, and occasion-based
solutions.
PepsiCo’s
reset suggests the company is beginning to internalize this reality. Those who
stop paying for shelf space and start paying attention to how consumers
actually eat and drink will win—at retail, in convenience, and across the
entire Grocerant ecosystem.
Success Leaves Clues—Are You Ready to Find Yours?
One
key insight that continues to drive success is this: "The consumer is
dynamic, not static." This principle is the foundation of our work at Foodservice
Solutions®, where Steven Johnson, the Grocerant Guru®, has been
helping brands stay relevant in an ever-evolving market.
Want
to strengthen your brand’s connection with today’s consumers? Let’s talk.
Call 253-759-7869 for more information.
Stay Ahead of the Competition with Fresh Ideas
Is
your food marketing keeping up with tomorrow’s trends—or stuck in yesterday’s
playbook? If you're ready for fresh ideations that set your brand apart, we’re
here to help.
At
Foodservice Solutions®, we specialize in consumer-driven retail food
strategies that enhance convenience, differentiation, and
individualization—key factors in driving growth.
👉
Email us at Steve@FoodserviceSolutions.us
👉 Connect with us on social media:
Facebook,
LinkedIn,
Twitter






No comments:
Post a Comment