The Grocery Industry Has Become Exceptionally Good at
Watching Shelves, Categories and Inventory—and Surprisingly Bad at Watching
Where the Customer Is Going
You
have all heard the old grocery adage: “Stack ’em high and let ’em fly.”
For
generations, that was grocery retailing in a nutshell. Keep the shelves full,
keep the displays attractive, keep the price tags accurate, manage the
categories and let the customer do the rest.
But
what happens when the customer stops coming?
That
is the question grocery retailers should be asking today.
Because
the grocery industry has become extraordinarily sophisticated at watching
the store. Technology can monitor shelves, inventory, pricing, planograms,
promotions, shrink, replenishment and even whether a particular SKU is sitting
exactly where the category manager says it should be.
But
who is watching the customer?
And
more importantly: Who is watching where the customer is going when they
leave the grocery store?
That
may be the most important question facing traditional grocery retail today.
The Grocery Store Can Now Watch Almost Everything—Except
the Most Important Thing
Consider
how far grocery technology has come.
Autonomous
shelf-scanning robots such as Tally, powered by computer vision, can move
through stores multiple times a day identifying out-of-stocks, misplaced
products, pricing problems and shelf conditions. Simbe says its technology now
analyzes billions of shelf images and can provide retailers with real-time
shelf intelligence.
That
is impressive.
And
it should be.
Out-of-stocks
cost retailers sales. Incorrect prices frustrate shoppers. Poor planogram
execution wastes valuable selling space. Phantom inventory—where the system
says the product exists but the customer cannot find it—is a very real retail
problem.
Technology
can help solve these problems.
But
here is where I believe the grocery industry needs to take the next step:
A
perfectly stocked shelf does not guarantee a sale.
A
perfectly executed planogram does not guarantee a customer.
A
perfectly managed category does not guarantee relevance.
And
a perfectly accurate inventory count does not tell you why the consumer decided
to buy dinner somewhere else.
That
is the distinction between watching the store and watching the customer.
The Legacy Grocery Model Was Built Around Departments
Traditional
grocery organizations are still heavily structured around departments and
categories:
Produce.
Meat.
Seafood.
Dairy.
Frozen.
Grocery.
Bakery.
Deli.
Center
store.
Beverages.
Snacks.
Each
category traditionally has somebody watching it.
There
are category managers.
Buyers.
Merchandisers.
Planners.
Replenishment
teams.
Supply-chain
analysts.
Pricing
analysts.
Promotional
planners.
Inventory
specialists.
And
now there are artificial-intelligence systems, computer vision, electronic
shelf labels, robotics, predictive analytics and increasingly sophisticated
loyalty databases.
The
industry has invested billions of dollars in learning what is happening
inside the four walls.
But
the consumer doesn't live inside those four walls.
The
consumer lives in a world of occasions.
“I
need breakfast.”
“I
need lunch.”
“I
need something for dinner.”
“I
need something quick.”
“I
don't feel like cooking.”
“I
need something inexpensive.”
“I
need something now.”
“I
want something healthier.”
“I
want something indulgent.”
“I
want something I can eat in the car.”
Those
are not departments.
Those
are consumer occasions.
And
increasingly, consumers are solving those occasions outside the traditional
grocery store.
The Customer Has Not Abandoned Food. The Customer Has
Changed Where Food Is Purchased.
This
is where the grocery industry needs to look beyond its own aisles.
Circana
reports that the average U.S. household shops at 39 unique retailers
annually, illustrating just how fragmented and omnichannel today's consumer
has become. Its research also finds lower-income households increasing trips to
value retailers and dollar stores.
That
means the question isn't simply:
“How
did we do versus last year?”
The
better question is:
“Where
did the consumer spend the occasion that we used to own?”
That
is a radically different question.
A
consumer may buy milk at a supermarket, coffee at a convenience store, lunch at
a QSR, snacks at a dollar store and dinner from a restaurant—all on the same
day.
The
grocery store doesn't necessarily lose the entire consumer.
It
loses the occasion.
And
losing enough occasions eventually means losing the customer relationship.
Restaurants Are Watching the Occasion
Restaurants
have spent years learning that they are not merely selling food.
They
are selling:
Convenience.
Speed.
Craveability.
Portability.
Value.
Indulgence.
No
cleanup.
No
preparation.
Immediate
gratification.
That
is why the grocery industry's competition is no longer simply Kroger versus
Albertsons versus Walmart versus Costco.
The
competitive set increasingly includes McDonald's, Taco Bell, Starbucks,
7-Eleven, Dollar General, local restaurants, delivery platforms and virtually
any retailer capable of solving a food occasion.
Circana
reported U.S. foodservice operator spending of $357.3 billion for the 12
months ending June 2025, up 3.7% year over year.
Meanwhile,
convenience stores have been quietly transforming themselves into foodservice
competitors.
According
to NACS, U.S. convenience-store foodservice represented 28.5% of in-store
sales and 38.9% of in-store gross profit dollars in 2025. Prepared food
accounted for 73.9% of convenience-store foodservice sales.
Think
about that.
The
convenience store used to be thought of primarily as a place to buy gasoline,
cigarettes, beverages and packaged snacks.
Today,
prepared food—including pizza, chicken, burgers, sandwiches, wraps and
salads—is one of its most important economic engines.
The
c-store didn't simply add food.
It
began competing for food occasions.
Then There Is the Dollar Store
Dollar
stores represent another lesson grocery retailers should be studying.
Their
proposition is brutally simple:
Value
+ Convenience + Small Basket + Immediate Need.
Circana
specifically identifies dollar stores as value-oriented formats serving
frequent, small-basket trips and notes that lower-income households are
increasing their trips to value retailers and dollar stores.
And
Dollar General's fiscal 2025 numbers demonstrate the scale of consumables
within that business: consumables generated approximately $35.1 billion in
annual sales, representing the company's largest merchandise category.
So
while traditional grocery retailers are asking:
“How
do we optimize this category?”
Dollar
stores are also asking:
“How
do we make this trip easier, cheaper and faster?”
Those
are very different questions.
The Grocery Industry's Technology Trap
This
is where technology can become both a solution and a distraction.
Technology
is terrific at answering questions such as:
·
Is the SKU on the shelf?
·
Is it in the correct location?
·
Is the price tag correct?
·
Is the shelf full?
·
Is inventory available?
·
Is the promotion executed?
·
Is the planogram compliant?
·
Is there phantom inventory?
·
How much shrink occurred?
But
those questions are largely inside-the-store questions.
The
next generation of grocery technology must answer questions such as:
·
Why did the customer come in?
·
What occasion were they trying to
solve?
·
What did they buy?
·
What didn't they buy?
·
What did they substitute?
·
What did they buy elsewhere?
·
How frequently are they visiting
restaurants?
·
Which meals are migrating to
convenience stores?
·
Which occasions are migrating to
dollar stores?
·
Which grocery trips are becoming
smaller?
·
Why are shoppers making more frequent
quick trips?
·
What does the customer consider
“value” today?
·
What causes the customer to abandon a
planned purchase?
·
What would have made the customer buy
dinner at the grocery store instead of a restaurant?
That
is customer intelligence.
And
it is fundamentally different from inventory intelligence.
The Consumer Is Already Sending Grocery Retailers the
Signal
Circana
has reported that grocery quick trips increased 8.9%, while shoppers purchased
11% fewer items per trip. It also found consumers purchasing more perimeter
items—including deli-prepared and heat-and-eat foods—on those quick trips.
That
should set off alarms.
The
consumer is effectively saying:
“I
don't necessarily want to shop your entire store. I want to solve today's
problem.”
That
is an enormous distinction.
The
traditional grocery model was built around basket building.
The
emerging consumer is increasingly interested in occasion solving.
And
the retailers that understand that difference can build entirely different
businesses.
Grocery's Opportunity May Actually Be Sitting in Its Own
Deli
There
is an important irony here.
Grocery
retailers may not need to become restaurants.
They
may need to become better at being grocery retailers that understand
foodservice.
FMI
reported that consumers increasingly view deli-prepared foods as an alternative
to restaurant meals, with the share substituting deli-prepared foods for
restaurant meals more than doubling from 12% in 2017 to 28% in 2025. FMI also
reported retail foodservice dollar sales of $52.1 billion over the latest
12-month period covered by that research.
That
is not a side business.
That
is a strategic opportunity.
But
it requires a different mindset.
The
deli cannot simply be managed like another department.
A
hot bar cannot be treated like canned soup.
A
prepared sandwich cannot be managed like sliced cheese.
A
rotisserie chicken is not merely another SKU.
These
are meal solutions.
They
compete directly with restaurants.
And
the consumer judges them accordingly.
The Real Question: Who Is Watching the Migration?
Here
is my challenge to grocery executives:
Imagine
having a dashboard that tells you every out-of-stock item in your store within
minutes.
Now
imagine having another dashboard that tells you:
“Your
customers purchased 14,000 fewer dinner occasions from you this month—and here
is where those occasions went.”
Which
dashboard would you rather have?
I
know my answer.
I
want both.
Because
operational excellence matters.
But
operational excellence without consumer relevance can simply make you more
efficient at operating yesterday's business model.
The New Grocery Scorecard Should Include the Customer
Outside the Store
The
grocery industry needs to expand its definition of store intelligence.
I
would build a new Customer Migration Scorecard measuring at least five
things:
1. Occasion Migration
Track
which breakfast, lunch, dinner and snack occasions are moving to restaurants,
convenience stores, dollar stores and other channels.
2. Trip Migration
Measure
not just transaction count but where trips are moving.
A
declining grocery trip may not mean consumers are eating less.
They
may simply be shopping elsewhere.
3. Basket Migration
A
shopper may still visit your store but purchase fewer items.
That
matters.
Circana's
data showing more frequent quick trips but fewer items per trip should force
retailers to examine exactly what is disappearing from the basket.
4. Meal-Solution Performance
Stop
measuring prepared foods only by department sales.
Measure:
How
many meals did we solve?
How
many meals did we lose?
How
much restaurant business could we capture?
5. Competitive Occasion Intelligence
Every
grocery retailer should know its top 20 occasions that are being lost to:
Restaurants.
QSRs.
C-stores.
Dollar
stores.
Club
stores.
Delivery.
Other
grocers.
If
you don't know where the customer went, you don't really know why your business
changed.
“Stack Them High and Let Them Fly” Needs an Upgrade
The
old grocery mantra still matters.
A
customer cannot buy what isn't available.
Technology
that reduces out-of-stocks is valuable.
Robotics
and computer vision can make stores more accurate and give associates more time
to serve shoppers. Simbe, for example, says its deployments have produced
measurable reductions in out-of-stocks and manual shelf-auditing time at
participating retailers.
But
perhaps the new mantra should be:
“Know
the customer. Solve the occasion. Make it available. Make it valuable. Make it
easy.”
That
is a much bigger assignment.
The Grocerant Guru® Perspective
I
have long argued that the Grocerant Niche is about the blurring of food
channels.
The
grocery store is no longer competing only with the grocery store.
The
restaurant is competing with the grocery store.
The
convenience store is competing with the grocery store.
The
dollar store is competing with the grocery store.
And
increasingly, every retailer that can provide a fresh prepared Ready-2-Eat
or Heat-N-Eat solution is competing for the same consumer occasion.
So,
yes, watch your shelves.
Use
technology.
Deploy
artificial intelligence.
Use
computer vision.
Eliminate
phantom inventory.
Fix
pricing errors.
Reduce
out-of-stocks.
Optimize
planograms.
But
don't confuse store intelligence with customer intelligence.
The
shelf can tell you what happened to the product.
The
POS can tell you what sold.
The
category manager can tell you what happened to the category.
But
only customer intelligence can tell you:
Why
didn't the customer buy from you?
And
even more importantly:
Where
did they go instead?
That
is the question grocery retailers should be watching.
Because
the future of grocery retailing may not be determined by who has the
best-managed store.
It
may be determined by who understands the customer well enough to keep the
customer from leaving the store in the first place.
Remember:
Success does leave clues.
The
clue grocery retailers need now may not be sitting on the shelf.
It
may be walking out the front door.
Are
you ready for some fresh ideations? Do your food marketing tactics look more
like yesterday than tomorrow?
Visit
Foodservice Solutions® for more information or
contact Steve@FoodserviceSolutions.us.
The
Grocerant Guru®
Steve Johnson
Foodservice Solutions®










No comments:
Post a Comment