Starbucks' decision to pull back from pricing promotions
under new CEO Brian Niccol could create ripple effects across the brand and the
wider foodservice landscape according to Steven Johnson Grocerant Guru® at Tacoma, WA
based Foodservice Solutions®.
Starbucks pivot
away from discounting, once a staple to lure in price-sensitive consumers,
signals a fundamental shift in Starbucks’ marketing and messaging. While the
intention is to revive its "community coffee house" identity and
reduce transactional customer-employee interactions, the strategy may come with
substantial risks. The following analysis explores how halting all pricing
promotions could backfire and what positive outcomes Starbucks might hope to achieve. Finally,
a comparison of other retail brands that tried similar strategies highlights
potential long-term pitfalls.
Negative Results from Stopping Pricing
Promotions
1.
Drop in Foot Traffic: Promotions like BOGO weekends and discount days have
historically driven high customer traffic at Starbucks. In Q3 2024, U.S.
same-store sales already fell by 2%, and foot traffic decreased by 6%. Without
these promotions, Starbucks risks accelerating this decline, as fewer customers
will visit without the incentive of a deal.
2.
Diminished Customer
Loyalty: Starbucks’ rewards program, which
boasts over 30 million members, has thrived on regular promotional offerings
like “Summer App-y Days” and half-price Fridays. Removing these promotions may
cause disillusionment among loyal customers who depend on these discounts for
affordable access to premium coffee. The risk of attrition is real, with fewer
reasons for customers to engage frequently.
3.
Competitive
Disadvantage: With McDonald’s and Burger King
continuing aggressive discount campaigns like the $5 Meal Deal and $5 Your Way
Meal, Starbucks could lose market share. Customers facing inflationary
pressures are likely to opt for competitors who still offer value-driven
promotions. This could widen the traffic gap and intensify Starbucks' 7%
transaction drop in fiscal Q2 2024.
4.
Loss of Digital
Engagement: Starbucks' app-based promotions
drive customer engagement and increase average ticket sales by encouraging
add-ons. Ending these deals may reduce the frequent app use that has fueled
digital orders and loyalty points redemptions. In a tech-savvy consumer market,
a dip in digital engagement could hurt Starbucks’ momentum in the convenience
and quick-service space.
5.
Employee Burnout
Persists: One of the justifications for
reducing promotions is to alleviate strain on baristas who face high volumes
during discount periods. However, without addressing core operational
inefficiencies, Starbucks may continue to see sluggish order preparation times,
which was a major complaint under former CEO Laxman Narasimhan. Cutting
promotions won’t fix systemic issues like understaffing or slow service.
6.
Negative Consumer
Perception: Starbucks' move to focus on premium
experiences and steer away from promotions might alienate its broader customer
base. Many customers view Starbucks as an affordable luxury, not a high-end
coffee house. If the brand is perceived as elitist or out of touch with the
average consumer, it could face long-term reputational damage.
Potential Positive Outcomes of the
Strategy
1.
Brand Elevation to
Premium Status: By focusing on creating an upscale
coffee experience, Starbucks hopes to transition away from a value-oriented
image and attract higher-paying customers willing to pay for premium quality.
This aligns with Niccol’s goal of rebuilding Starbucks' identity as a community
coffee house rather than a quick-service pitstop.
2.
Increased Average
Ticket Value: Though traffic may decline,
Starbucks could see an increase in the average ticket size. A more refined,
premium menu could attract customers willing to spend more per visit. This
strategy could stabilize the company’s revenue even with lower customer counts.
3.
Better In-Store
Experience: Niccol’s push for improved store
design and seating, as well as distinguishing between dine-in and to-go
services, could enhance the in-store customer experience. If successful, this
might encourage guests to linger and spend more on additional items such as
pastries or sandwiches, helping to boost same-store sales over time.
4.
Operational
Efficiency: By easing off promotions, Starbucks
might streamline operations and reduce the chaos that stems from overwhelming
discount-driven traffic spikes. A more consistent flow of customers could lead
to improved service quality, faster order fulfillment, and better employee
morale.
5.
Stronger Brand
Identity: Positioning Starbucks as a space for
community engagement rather than purely transactional visits could reinforce
customer loyalty among those seeking more than just a quick coffee fix. This
aligns with Niccol's aim to reconnect the brand with its roots as a "third
place" between home and work.
6.
Long-Term
Profitability: While the short-term hit to traffic
may be painful, eliminating discounts could ultimately lead to a more
sustainable business model. Starbucks may cultivate a more loyal,
higher-spending customer base and avoid the pitfalls of discount dependency, a
strategy that can erode profit margins over time.
Lessons from Other Retailers
1.
J.C. Penney’s
Pricing Strategy: In 2012, J.C. Penney famously
removed its regular discount offers, aiming to reposition the brand as a
premium retailer. This resulted in a steep sales decline as loyal customers
fled, accustomed to the brand's deep discounts. It took years for J.C. Penney
to recover from the backlash, proving that eliminating promotions can alienate
core customers and lead to financial losses.
2.
Applebee’s Shift to
“Neighborhood” Vibes: Applebee’s once emphasized community
engagement and a return to its "neighborhood" roots, moving away from
its well-known value promotions. Sales stagnated as customers viewed the chain
as a low-cost dining option and balked at paying higher prices. Applebee's
eventually reintroduced discount promotions to revitalize its traffic.
3. Chili's Focus on Premium Menu: Chili’s tried to abandon discounting in favor of promoting premium menu items to boost revenue per customer. The result was a dip in traffic that led to stagnant same-store sales and a reversion to more value-driven deals. The move showed that customers often expect promotions as part of the dining experience.
Think About This
While Starbucks may have valid reasons for stepping back
from promotions, history shows that such decisions come with substantial risks.
Consumer expectations, especially in the current economic climate, lean toward
value-driven options. If Starbucks fails to navigate this transition carefully,
it could suffer long-term consequences, just as other brands have. Balancing
premium aspirations with customer engagement will be critical for its success.
For
international corporate presentations, regional chain presentations,
educational forums, or keynotes contact: Steven Johnson Grocerant Guru® at Tacoma, WA
based Foodservice Solutions. His
extensive experience as a multi-unit restaurant operator, consultant, brand /
product positioning expert, and public speaking will leave success clues for
all. For more information visit GrocerantGuru.com, FoodserviceSolutions.US or call
1-253-759-7869
No comments:
Post a Comment