When
politics spill into the glass, brands get burned. The recent Reuters report on
U.S. spirits exports falling 9% in the second quarter highlights how
political entanglements — in this case, tariff tensions — can ripple far beyond
trade policy. For food and beverage marketers, it’s a potent reminder: in a
hyper-connected, emotionally charged world, brands that wade into politics
risk alienating their global audience faster than you can say “cheers.”
The Spirits Slump: When Trade Wars Meet Brand Wars
According
to the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (DISCUS), exports
to major markets — the EU, Canada, Britain, and Japan — collectively dropped
9%, with Canada plunging 85%. This isn’t just about tariffs; it’s about perception.
As DISCUS President Chris Swonger warned, international consumers are
“increasingly opting for domestically produced spirits.”
That’s
code for: politics is influencing purchase behavior.
Brands
like Jack Daniel’s and Pernod Ricard are feeling the chill not
because of poor marketing or inferior product quality, but because “Made in the
USA” has, temporarily, become politically loaded in some markets. This is the
danger when brand identity collides with geopolitics — your product becomes a
proxy for policy.
The Dangers of Being the “Out Crowd” Brand
In
branding, perception is reality. And when your brand becomes associated with
the “out crowd” — politically, socially, or culturally — recovery can take
years.
The
Grocerant Guru® warns that brand alignment should always prioritize consumer
trust and inclusivity over political identification. The moment a brand
becomes a flag-bearer for one side, it risks losing the other half of its
market — or, worse, becoming irrelevant in global markets where that side is
unpopular.
Let’s
look at three fact-filled food industry examples where brand alignment
went wrong:
In A Battle for Share of Stomach
Messaging Matters
1. Bud Light and the Dylan Mulvaney Fallout (2023)
When
Bud Light partnered with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney, it ignited a
political firestorm. The backlash from conservative consumers led to a 28%
drop in sales volume within weeks and a loss of shelf space in key retail
chains.
Grocerant Guru® Insight: Consumers buy into identity as much as product.
When your brand becomes a battleground for identity politics, loyalty shifts to
safer, neutral alternatives.
2. Chick-fil-A’s Political Donations (2019)
The
chain faced years of controversy over its donations to organizations perceived
as anti-LGBTQ+. Although Chick-fil-A never explicitly took a political stance, public
perception defined it. The company eventually changed its charitable giving
to distance itself from the issue — a costly and brand-defining pivot.
Grocerant Guru® Insight: Silence isn’t neutrality if consumers see
values misalignment. Transparency, consistency, and a focus on shared values
like community and quality food are stronger than any side-taking.
3. Starbucks’ “Race Together” Campaign (2015)
Starbucks
tried to spark conversations about race by having baristas write “Race
Together” on cups. The campaign was widely mocked, poorly received, and
abandoned within days.
Grocerant Guru® Insight: Consumers don’t want their coffee to lecture
them. They want it to reflect comfort, community, and connection — not
controversy.
Why Global Brands Must Stay Apolitical
Trade,
taste, and trust are the three pillars of global food and beverage branding.
When trade barriers rise, brands can survive. When trust barriers rise, they
collapse.
The
U.S. spirits industry’s export slump shows how politics disrupts perception,
creating ripple effects across distribution, marketing, and consumer loyalty.
The Grocerant Guru® notes that even fast-food giants like McDonald’s
have reported “rising anti-American sentiment” in markets like Northern Europe
and Canada — proof that even neutral brands can be caught in the crossfire
when politics turn polarizing.
Grocerant Guru® Insights
1. Stay
in the Lane of Lifestyle, Not Politics.
Successful grocerant and CPG brands sell belonging and enjoyment,
not ideology. Consumers want experiences, not political statements.
2. Brand
Equity Is Fragile.
Every message, partnership, and campaign adds to — or subtracts from — trust.
Neutrality isn’t weakness; it’s long-term brand preservation.
3. Global
Consistency Matters.
In today’s digital marketplace, your local stance becomes your global
reputation. A tweet in Tennessee can cost you sales in Tokyo.
Think
About This
Whether
it’s whiskey, coffee, or fried chicken, the message is clear: politics and
product don’t mix well. The Grocerant Guru® advises brands to double down
on universal values — flavor, community, sustainability, and joy — and avoid
becoming a cultural lightning rod.
Because
at the end of the day, consumers raise their glass to taste, trust, and
timelessness — not to politics.
Are you ready for some fresh ideations?
Do your food marketing ideas look more like yesterday than tomorrow? Interested
in learning how our Grocerant Guru® can edify your retail food brand while creating a platform
for consumer convenient meal participation, differentiation
and individualization? Email us
at: Steve@FoodserviceSolutions.us or visit: us on our social media sites by clicking one of the
following links: Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment