Once
again convenience is more important than even price yet price is playing a big
role today in where consumers are going to get their food. That according to
our very own Grocerant Guru® who once again found a new study that edifies the
findings of Foodservice
Solutions® teams grocerant ScoreCards.
Recently
almost half (46%) of Americans cited the cost of food as the biggest obstacle
to following a healthy diet, whilst parents were twice as likely to opt for a
fast-food diet than their child-free counterparts. Now that I have your
attention you had better keep reading.
So,
despite food prices falling in May, it’s still much cheaper to choose a fast-food
meal than buying the equivalent items from a grocery store. There is a new
study that has revealed which states will find it harder to prioritize making
healthy food choices than others, based on the cost of groceries versus a
fast-food meal.
This
time the research, conducted by fitness experts Total
Shape, pulled together the average cost of a fast-food combo meal in each
state, and compared this to grocery store prices of equivalent food items
— including ground beef, chicken breasts, potatoes, and bread. Here
is what was reported in the study:
“Despite
world food prices falling to a two-year low in May — according to the
United Nations world price index — grocery food inflation is still causing
concern across America.
This
is evident in a recent survey by the Cleveland Clinic, which found almost half
(46%) of Americans cite the cost of food as the biggest obstacle to following a
healthy diet, whilst parents were twice as likely to opt for a fast-food diet
than their child-free counterparts.
Across
America, the average fast-food combo meal costs $9.55, whilst buying the
ingredients needed to make the same meal at home would set you back about
$22.
This
price increase is due to the typical product portion sizes in supermarkets,
meaning those debating making their own meal or grabbing one from a nearby
drive-thru have to weigh up the cost of buying all the ingredients, even if
they only plan to use a little of each.
If
you already have the ingredients in your pantry at home — including ground
beef, cheese, bread, and potatoes — making your own is a little cheaper,
with a per-portion price of $5.81.
The
new ranking shows that some states will have a much harder time prioritizing
healthy food choices, as fast-food meals are significantly cheaper than buying
all the ingredients.
In
Minnesota, the per-portion cost of making a burger and fries — or chicken
tenders meal — is $4.71, whilst it costs just $7 to buy a combo meal from
a fast-food chain. The home cooking cost then rises to $21.46 for those who
need to buy all of the ingredients from the store.
Meanwhile,
people in Nevada will find it easier to justify buying the ingredients over
placing a food order, as a combo meal is $13.50, versus a per-portion grocery
spend of $5.81 — meaning they’d be spending twice as much to justify an
unhealthy food choice.
States
that have to spend more to make healthy food choices:
·
Minnesota
·
Montana
·
Missouri
·
Indiana
·
Vermont
·
Mississippi
·
Oklahoma
·
Virginia
·
Georgia
·
Ohio
Average
wage also plays a part in determining how easy it is to cook rather than eating
fast food, with some states having to spend more of their salary to buy the
same groceries.
The
data reveals that shoppers in Iowa don't see their $47.3k salary stretch as far
as other states when buying groceries, as food prices are 56% higher than in
the cheapest state.
Other
states that end up having to spend more of their salary on groceries: Montana,
Hawaii, Tennessee, and South Dakota. New Jersey spends the
least.
According
to food plans created by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, a single
"thrifty" person should be spending $274 on their monthly
groceries ($244 for women and $304 for men), whilst those with a higher income
can afford to spend up to $428.
However,
when compared to the average salary of $51,013, even the thriftiest food shop
price is a stretch for many, as it equates to $3,288 a year — 44% higher
than the $2,280 that consumers spent on food last year, as reported by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Speaking
on the findings, a Total Shape spokesperson said:
“As we approach summer, many Americans will find themselves having to make
quick meal decisions when out and about — and unfortunately, they’re
highly likely to eat fast food over cooking at home.
“Whilst
there’s nothing wrong with fast food in moderation, it’s concerning that
consumers turn to unhealthy meals to avoid the cost of buying groceries
— especially as this actually ends up being more expensive in the long run
when per-portion costs are considered."”
Are you ready for some fresh ideations? Do your food
marketing ideas look more like yesterday than tomorrow? Interested in learning
how our Grocerant Guru® can edify your retail food brand while creating a platform
for consumer convenient meal participation, differentiation,
and individualization? Email us
at: Steve@FoodserviceSolutions.us or visit: us on our social media sites by
clicking one of the following links: Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment